Q&A with Christian Horner, Team Principal
Q: What happened on lap 40 of the Turkish GP?CH: We had a unique situation during the Turkish GP where the first four cars were separated by twoseconds, with Mark having led every lap until lap 40. The race was the fastest of the season to date withall four drivers pushing each other extremely hard. On lap 38, Mark changed his mixture setting based onhis fuel consumption to a slightly leaner mode, which had an average lap time loss of about 0.18seconds, whilst maintaining the same revs. Sebastian had conserved more fuel than Mark during the raceand therefore was able to run in a slightly better mode for an additional couple of laps. On lap 38 and 39,Sebastian’s pace picked up and he closed right up to the back of Mark while under considerable pressurefrom Hamilton behind. After a very strong run through Turn 9, Sebastian got a run and strong tow andmoved to the left to pass Mark. Mark held the inside line and adopted a defensive position, which he isentitled to do. When Sebastian was three quarters of the way past, he moved to the right. As Sebastianmoved to the right, Mark held his position and the ensuing result was contact that resulted in Sebastianretiring, Mark damaging the front-end of his car and the team losing a one two finish. Ultimately bothdrivers should have given each other more room.
Q: Was either driver to blame for the incident?CH: What we expect from our drivers, as team mates, is that they show respect for each other and allowone another enough room on the race track. Unfortunately neither driver did this on Sunday and the netresult was an incident between the two. During the previous six one-two finishes we have achieved, therehave been many incidences of close racing between our drivers and they have previously always abidedby this understanding.
Q: What do you think about Sebastian’s actions when he got out of the car?CH: The adrenaline was flowing and obviously there’s a great deal of frustration when you’ve just crashedout of a race. It will be discussed and I am certain that the air will be cleared before Canada.
Q: Some people commented after the race that Mark was to blame – why was that?
CH: Ultimately we win as a team and we lose as a team and on Sunday we lost as a team, as a result ofour two drivers having an incident. Having looked at all the information it’s clear that it was a racingaccident that shouldn’t have happened between two team-mates. After looking at all the facts that weren’tavailable immediately after the race, Dr. Marko also fully shares this view.
Q: What do you think would have happened if Mark and Sebastian hadn’t collided?CH: Our priority as a team is to finish first and second, irrelevant of the order. The Turkish GP was theclosest race of probably the last twelve months with significant pressure coming from both of theMcLarens. Sebastian’s pace improved from lap 37 onwards and he appeared to be the faster of the twoRed Bull drivers. Had the incident not have happened, I believe we would have achieved a one-two finishand a maximum score for the second race in succession.
Q: Were you happy that Sebastian challenged Mark for the lead at that point in the race? You hada one-two, so why not stick with that?CH: With the pace of the McLarens and with it looking like Sebastian was the quicker of the two Red Bullcars, the priority was to win the race. With intense pressure from Hamilton behind, who was in a McLarenthat had a significant straight line speed advantage, it would have been impossible to back Sebastian off.Therefore it was acceptable to us for him to attempt an overtaking manoeuvre.
Q: Were there any team orders given for Sebastian to pass Mark?CH: Neither driver was given any instruction to change position. There are no team orders within Red BullRacing, other than that the drivers should race each other with respect.
Q: How will you resolve the situation?CH: We’re a very strong team and we will sit down and discuss this openly with the drivers in order tolearn from what has happened and avoid a situation like this arising again. One of the strengths ofRed Bull Racing is the team spirit here, which has contributed to the performance that we have achievedso far this season. The drivers are both intelligent individuals and this issue will be resolved prior to theCanadian Grand Prix.
Q: How will you deal with the drivers? Have you already spoken to them?CH: I have spoken with both drivers, who are both disappointed with what happened. They recognise thatthey represent the team and so are not only disappointed for their own loss, but the loss of points for theteam who put in so much hard work before the race.
Q: What’s the plan going forwards for the team? Will one of the drivers now be given number onestatus?CH: Both drivers, as has always been the case, will continue to be given equal treatment. The TurkishGrand Prix has been a costly lesson for both drivers and we are confident that this situation won’t happenagain.
Q: Were there any positives from the race for the team?CH: Up until lap 40 the race had been very positive for us. Despite our significant straight line speeddisadvantage to the McLarens, we had managed to not only maintain position with Mark through the pitstops against Hamilton, but we had also managed through strategy and excellent pit stop work forSebastian to leapfrog Hamilton during the pit stops. We were being pushed very hard, but appeared tohave the race within our grasp until lap 40. We will now move on from this as a team and concentrate onthe Canadian Grand Prix.
Q: What is Mr. Mateschitz’s opinion of the incident?CH: Dietrich has spoken with both drivers following the incident. He has always supported both driversequally and summed it up by saying, ”Shit happens… we shouldn’t talk about the past, but concentrate onthe future. The fact is that we not only have the fastest car, but also two of the best and fastest drivers”.
