Are safer cars actually causing more accidents?
An article published today in the September issue of BIKE magazine has shown that windscreen pillars obstructing a driver's vision are likely to be a major factor in road accidents.
Paul Smith, founder of the Safe Speed road safety campaign, has joined forces with the editorial team of Britain's best selling motorcycling monthly magazine to highlight this serious, but largely unrecognised safety problem.
Road safety guru Paul comments:-
"This problem came to my attention way back in the early 80s. I was driving a car in London, turning right from a side road into a one way system. As I started to turn a motorbike literally appeared from nowhere. I managed to stop, but was intrigued and drove around the block again….it was instantly obvious that motorbikes were being completely obscured from view by my nearside windscreen pillar".
Rich Beach, News Editor of Bike magazine comments:-
"When Paul Smith raised the screen pillar issue with us, we were astonished by how little research has been done on the subject, but in the course of investigating and writing the Bike magazine feature, it became clear that it is a huge problem, and one that we need to draw attention to.
The research we have accessed indicates that a huge number of motorcycle accidents (almost 70%) involve a car, truck or bus, and that over 70% of these accidents were caused by "perception error" - all too often bikes are just not being seen".
The last official research in the UK into obstruction by windscreen pillars was carried out over 40 years ago in 1963. More recently, the Department of Transport studied "look but failed to see" (LBFtS) accidents, LBFtS being a contributory factor in 20% of all road accidents, however the possibility of windscreen pillar obscuration wasn't even considered.
Adam Duckworth, publisher of Bike feels that this is a massive safety problem, that has simply been overlooked "Passenger protection is a obviously a priority for car manufacturers, but having looked at all the facts, we believe that accidents could be avoided in the first place if windscreen pillars were designed to allow optimum vision.
This is an issue that the entire motorcycling industry needs to get behind, as bikers are all too often the innocent victims. Indeed, the Motorcycle Industry Association (MCIA), and the British Motorcyclists Federation (BMF), are already taking our findings on board and have agreed to join forces with us to lobby the government and car manufacturers".
About Safe Speed
The Safe Speed road safety campaign is primarily the work of engineer-turned road safety analyst Paul Smith.
Since setting up Safe Speed in 2001, Paul Smith, 49, an advanced motorist and road safety enthusiast, and a professional engineer of 25 years UK experience, has carried out about 5,000 hours of research into the overall effects of speed camera policy on UK road safety. We believe that this is more work in more detail than anything carried out by any other organisation. Paul's surprising conclusion is that overall speed cameras make our roads more dangerous. Paul has identified and reported a number of major flaws and false assumptions in the claims made for speed cameras, and the whole "speed kills" system of road safety.
The inescapable conclusion is that we should urgently return to the excellent road safety policies that gave us in the UK the safest roads in the World in the first place.
Safe Speed does not campaign against speed limits or appropriate enforcement of motoring laws, but argues vigorously that automated speed enforcement is neither safe nor appropriate.
